PeerMarker
Accelerated language development through peer-to-peer marking of written assignments. Autograde these written assignments for the teacher.
How does it work?
Educator
Create
Optionally, provide a rubric to guide the peer-review and ranking of the submitted answers
Student
First Draft Submission
They, too, review their peer’s work and annotate constructive feedback.
Peer Reviews
Students evaluate feedback and can submit one or more drafts for review.
Student
Final Submission
Final answers are submitted for peer-ranking.
Peer Ranking
Educator Grading
JumpTrakTM grades the rest.
Auto Grading
Teachers set exercises
The teacher creates the exercise.
Learners open an exercise and create a draft for review
The learner’s submit a first draft and send it for peer review.
Once submitted, others can review it
Learner review their peer’s submissions anonymous, adding positive and constructive annotations against a simple rubric.
Learners can apply peer feedback and submit new draft submissions for a subsequent round reviews.
Learners perform ranking by saying which is better
The teacher initiates peer ranking where learners score anonymous submissions against each other.
Educator marks the selected top and bottom draft submissions
The teacher concludes the ranking and is presented with the top and bottom ranked submissions. The teacher gives these an educated mark.
JumpTrak™ completes the Grading
JumpTrak™ then completes the process by assigning a grade to each assignment from it’s ranked peer reviews and the teacher’s marked responses.